Maybe in rc11 will be mode buttons, no need to waste UI space for band buttons.
Liked On: 06.04.2026, 16:47
What You mean by “wins”? In mine observation MSHV is the kindest WSJT is in middle and JTDX gives worst (weakest) SNR values.
Liked On: 06.04.2026, 09:12
Or disable tci in log program ( I belive also log uses TCI)
Liked On: 31.03.2026, 09:49
I assume You using Fake it split, try using Rig split.
Liked On: 29.03.2026, 23:43
No, only usefull setting is to set rx freq itself correctly, according to waterfall. CY0S is a little less than 750. I have seen 735…740. on weak signals this can help.
Liked On: 21.03.2026, 06:56
No, only usefull setting is to set rx freq itself correctly, according to waterfall. CY0S is a little less than 750. I have seen 735…740. on weak signals this can help.
Liked On: 20.03.2026, 10:48
No, only usefull setting is to set rx freq itself correctly, according to waterfall. CY0S is a little less than 750. I have seen 735…740. on weak signals this can help.
Liked On: 20.03.2026, 10:40
There both 4. and 5. versions of hamlib available, just needed download correct version. Today decodium src become available. I compared decodium and wsjtx improved. Decodium decodes much better...
Liked On: 27.02.2026, 17:32
I don’t think FT2 will be implemented into JTDX. There nothing good, except speed. Sensitivity is even worse than CW, needed bandwidth to wide, pure waste. Maybe there will be some (robot) contests,...
Liked On: 27.02.2026, 17:18
Hamlib is included in jtdx distribution, no separate needed or even will not be used anyway. Jtdx can’t do anyhing with com port itself, all through hamlib, but I looked nothing is changed in hamlib...
Liked On: 27.02.2026, 04:28
So I assume connection is through hamlib ( FT 950 is selected in jtdx-s combobox). If not RF problem the problem should be in hamlib. Try launch jtdx from command prompt, maybe there is written...
Liked On: 26.02.2026, 02:36
I don’t think FT2 will be implemented into JTDX. There nothing good, except speed. Sensitivity is even worse than CW, needed bandwidth to wide, pure waste. Maybe there will be some (robot) contests,...
Liked On: 22.02.2026, 06:57
I don’t think FT2 will be implemented into JTDX. There nothing good, except speed. Sensitivity is even worse than CW, needed bandwidth to wide, pure waste. Maybe there will be some (robot) contests,...
Liked On: 21.02.2026, 19:54
I don’t think FT2 will be implemented into JTDX. There nothing good, except speed. Sensitivity is even worse than CW, needed bandwidth to wide, pure waste. Maybe there will be some (robot) contests,...
Liked On: 21.02.2026, 15:05
Settings/Sequencing tab, need to learn what there. JTDX become to complicated for many users, sorry. - - - Добавлено - - - Simplest way, to copy wsjtx_log.adi file between computers B4...
Liked On: 11.02.2026, 16:51