Yes I done this, currently own testing in progress, there lot of other changes connected to use of dxped message. Using filter does not work when A43WWA calls You (any filter is bypassed when called...
Liked On: 19.01.2026, 05:26
Will not change anything in wanted or filtering principles, but now I understand, why You built such combo of wanted and filters. You want jtdx to select only LOTW users for qso. Will think about it....
Liked On: 04.01.2026, 23:47
HNY! Conflicting wishes or order filtering/wanted filters. Wanted is checked first, text filters are checked after. Calls matching wanted are not checked further.
Liked On: 03.01.2026, 09:30
To be correct, in JTDX Fox was never implemented. Maybe in future will be done. There 2 different things 1. using Dxpd commands (RR73 to one report to other) 2. using multistream tx. Why not...
Liked On: 26.10.2025, 15:29
To be correct, in JTDX Fox was never implemented. Maybe in future will be done. There 2 different things 1. using Dxpd commands (RR73 to one report to other) 2. using multistream tx. Why not...
Liked On: 26.10.2025, 15:18
Yep clone from jtdx 159, also tci, only bad thing, nowhere mentioned that it is taken from jtdx. Expected some credentials. Stupid from their side.
Liked On: 17.09.2025, 09:45
Yep clone from jtdx 159, also tci, only bad thing, nowhere mentioned that it is taken from jtdx. Expected some credentials. Stupid from their side.
Liked On: 17.09.2025, 09:36
Yep clone from jtdx 159, also tci, only bad thing, nowhere mentioned that it is taken from jtdx. Expected some credentials. Stupid from their side.
Liked On: 17.09.2025, 08:11
In general also ini file is compatible with different versions. Newer versions may add some new keys (or not using some old keys). At least I never deleted ini file. Sure when ini is somehow screwed...
Liked On: 15.09.2025, 19:58
Yes from 160-rc6
Liked On: 12.09.2025, 10:57
No, hash values are different.
Liked On: 11.08.2025, 10:22
This is 3-d option from bottom, but it is off. Try to enable and them move to other place and then disable.
Liked On: 14.07.2025, 22:54
Stupid nonstd callsign owner calling with report. - - - Добавлено - - - You had std callsign in DxCall field, but in other side was correspondent using call with /, it is essential to have...
Liked On: 02.07.2025, 19:43
problem found and fixed. Z68YL has hash value 0. Anyway this is only beauty problem.
Liked On: 29.05.2025, 06:02
problem found and fixed. Z68YL has hash value 0. Anyway this is only beauty problem.
Liked On: 28.05.2025, 22:27